DH 2026

Daejeon, July 27–31

Thu, July 3009:00–10:30S055209-211
Short Paper

Developing an AI Cultural Heritage Docent Web Prototype: Internalizing Institutional Guidelines for Responsible Curation

Song-yi Jung
The Academy of Korean Studies, Republic of Korea · songi8812@gmail.com
Iro Lim
The Academy of Korean Studies, Republic of Korea · bkksg.studio@gmail.com
Baro Kim
The Academy of Korean Studies, Republic of Korea · ddokbaro@gmail.com

Background and Objectives

This study proposes a Graph-RAG-based AI Smart Docent web prototype that integrates a semantic knowledge graph with generative AI to overcome both LLM hallucination and the structural constraints of physical signage. Current cultural heritage information services face two structural limitations. First, traditional physical interpretive media remain confined to unilateral information delivery, providing uniform content despite the diversity of visitors’ ages, prior knowledge, and languages. Second, general-purpose LLMs introduced as an alternative tend to generate factually inaccurate information due to their lack of domain-specific knowledge, thereby undermining the epistemic reliability required in cultural heritage interpretation.

Selection of the Empirical Subject

This study selects the Hanging Painting of Janggoksa Temple (Maitreya Buddha, 1673, National Treasure) as a single empirical case. The work depicts dozens of iconographic figures—buddhas, bodhisattvas, and arhats—on a single canvas, and its hwagi (畫記) explicitly records diverse donation categories (materials, pigments, ritual offerings, production stages) and a roster of participating monk-painters. This data composition, in which iconographic classification and person-relation information richly coexist, provides suitable conditions for validating the proposed integration of a thesaurus and a relation-expressive knowledge graph (Jeong 2012; Park 2012; Korea Heritage Service 2022). The methodology is first validated through this work and then progressively extended to Buddhist sculpture, architecture, and archaeological sites, establishing a foundation for a generalizable generative docent model across Korean cultural heritage.

Methodological Orientation

This study formalizes humanities data—basic specifications, hwagi records, personal records, and thesauri—into RDF/OWL-based semantic data as a representational layer for scholarly knowledge sharing, and converts these data into a graph database for Graph-RAG inference. A generative AI Smart Docent model is then developed using verified data retrieved through natural language queries, and implemented as a web-based prototype.

Related Work and Differentiation

This study builds on prior research that leverages digital technologies to expand museums beyond their physical boundaries, including Semantic Web-based meta-archives (Jung 2023), immersive digital exhibitions in ubiquitous environments (Yoo 2014), and personalized smart docent services (Gu / Shin 2016). While generative AI has recently enabled highly personalized information delivery without pre-defined scenarios, its hallucination problem remains a critical limitation in domains requiring historical accuracy (Natale et al. 2025). Therefore, recent studies (MuseRAG++, Cultural Heritage Assistant) emphasize grounding responses in expert-verified data to ensure responsible curation and reliability (Trichopoulos et al. 2023; Nazar / Acosta 2023; Wang et al. 2025; Hu 2025).

Data Engineering and Knowledge Structuring

The core of this study lies in restructuring analog and unstructured source resources into machine-readable forms inferable by generative AI, thereby technically mitigating AI hallucination. (1) The signage guidelines issued by the Korea Heritage Service are formalized as rule-based constraints embedded into the system prompt, specifying a priori the narrative principles the AI must observe (Korea Heritage Service 2024). (2) Four categories of heterogeneous data—basic specifications, hwagi records, personal records, and thesauri—are formalized as RDF/OWL ontologies, leveraging SKOS for the iconographic thesaurus and CIDOC-CRM for semantic relations among persons, works, places, and events. The formalized data are then converted and loaded into a property graph in Neo4j for Graph-RAG inference, with iterative refinement: load results are validated via Cypher and the RDF/OWL source is revised on discrepancies. This establishes a dual structure: RDF/OWL functions as the representational standard for knowledge modeling and scholarly sharing, while the Neo4j property graph supports real-time inference and query response. (3) Multilingual designations and alternative names (imyeong, 異名) are collected and mapped from authoritative sources including the Digital Dictionary of Buddhism (Muller 2009), the Encyclopedia of Korean Culture, the Korean Heritage Portal, and the hwagi of the Janggoksa Hanging Painting of Maitreya Buddha (Korea Heritage Service 2022). Each value receives a source-identifying prefix to secure scholarly accuracy and provenance, technically supporting the epistemic reliability of AI-generated interpretation.

System Implementation and Inference Pipeline

Figure 1. System Architecture of the Interactive AI Cultural Heritage Docent

The Graph-RAG of this study is a RAG variant that uses structured query results from the graph database as grounding sources, aligning LLM responses with verified facts (see Figure 1). The backend server classifies natural language queries by type and selectively executes pre-defined Cypher queries, reliably retrieving core humanistic elements such as participating artists, dates, iconography, and hwagi records. In the generation stage, the LangChain framework integrates retrieved graph data into the prompt, with Google Gemini as the generative model. The system prompt incorporates the Korea Heritage Service guidelines, and the system adjusts narrative style and difficulty according to user expertise (children, general audiences, domain experts) and language preference, forming a customized generation mechanism in which the same grounding data can be reconfigured for different contexts.

Interaction and User Experience

Implemented with a Next.js front-end and a FastAPI back-end, the prototype offers a button-based interface for question selection and structured, data-grounded interpretation. The study further proposes an AI Smart Docent function in which core iconographic elements serve as SVG-based clickable images; selecting an element triggers real-time retrieval of associated graph data and generates a customized interpretation. This multimodal approach—integrating visual, textual, and structured data—lays a foundation for future extension to AR and 3D-based exhibition environments responsive to visitor interaction.

Conclusion and Expected Contributions

This study recontextualizes professional docent interpretation as a visitor-driven interactive experience. By formalizing dispersed humanities knowledge into a dual structure of RDF/OWL-based representation and graph-database-based inference with integrated real-time access, the system simultaneously supports scholarly knowledge sharing and AI-driven inference. By using verified semantic data as a grounding source to mitigate AI hallucination, the study presents the technical feasibility of responsible curation in digital environments. Ultimately, the model contributes a generalizable framework extensible to diverse cultural heritage domains, advancing the practical use of digital heritage and scholarly methodologies. The system's effectiveness, however, requires further validation through user evaluation and quantitative testing; the constructed RDF/OWL ontology and implementation code will be released with a forthcoming journal article to support reproducibility and collaborative extension within the digital cultural heritage research community.

References
  1. Books
  2. Kim, Jung-hee (2019): Hanguk Bulgyo Misulsa [한국불교미술사, History of Korean Buddhist Art]. Sechang Publishing Company.
  3. Kim, Won-ryong / Ahn, Hwi-joon (2003): Hanguk Misulsa [한국미술사, History of Korean Art]. Sigongsa.
  4. Korea Heritage Service (2019): Guidelines for Writing English Cultural Heritage Signage (Rev. ed.).
  5. Korea Heritage Service (2022): Daehyeong bulhwa jeongmil josa bogoseo 51: Gukbo Janggoksa Mireukbul gwaebultaeng [대형불화 정밀조사 보고서 51 _ 국보 장곡사 미륵불괘불탱, Research report of large Buddhist painting gwaebultaeng 51: Hanging Painting of Janggoksa Temple (Maitreya Buddha)]. Korea Heritage Service.
  6. Korea Heritage Service (2024): Gukga yusan annaepan tonghap garideuraen [국가유산 안내판 통합 가이드라인]. Korea Heritage Service.
  7. Moon, Myung-dae (2021): Hanguk Bulgyo Hoehwasa [한국불교회화사, History of Korean Buddhist painting]. Youlhwadang.
  8. Articles & Proceedings
  9. Bonetti, Ana / Salcedo-Puche, Adrian / Vila-Francés, Joan / Benavent-Garcia, Xavier / Fernández-Vargas, Elena / Magdalena-Benedito, Ramon / Soria-Olivas, Emilio (2025): “An Agent-Based RAG Architecture for Intelligent Tourism Assistance: The Valencia Case Study”, in: Preprints. DOI: 10.20944/preprints202511.0576.v1 
  10. Gu, Ja-yoon / Shin, Dong-heui (2016): “The Importance of Robot Personality in a Museum Context” [박물관 맥락에서의 로봇성격 설정의 중요성 연구], in: Journal of the Korea Contents Association [한국콘텐츠학회논문지], 16(3), 184–197. DOI: 10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.03.184
  11. Hu, Albert (2025): “MuseRAG++: A Deep Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Semantic Interaction and Multi-Modal Reasoning in Virtual Museums”, in: Research Square. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7281889/v1 
  12. Jeong, Myoung-hee (2012): “Iconographic overlap in the gwaebultaeng (掛佛幀, hanging Buddhist painting) at Janggoksa Temple, and its significance” [<長谷寺 靈山大會掛佛幀>에 보이는 도상의 중첩과 그 의미], in: Bulgyo Misulsahak [불교미술사학, Journal of Buddhist Art History] 14: 71–105.
  13. Ji, Ziwei / Lee, Nayeon / Frieske, Rita / Yu, Tiezheng / Su, Dan / Xu, Yan / Ishii, Etsuko / Bang, Yejin / Madotto, Andrea / Fung, Pascale (2023): “Survey of hallucination in natural language generation”, in: ACM Computing Surveys 55, 12: 1–38. DOI: 10.1145/3571730.
  14. Jung, Song-yi (2023): “Meta archive in the fields of arts and culture” [예술문화 분야에서의 메타 아카이브], in: Journal of Museum Studies [박물관학보] 45: 239–263.
  15. Muller, Charles (2009): “The Digital Dictionary of Buddhism [DDB]: Present Status and Future Developments”, in: Japanese Studies Around the World 15: 87–100.
  16. Nagasaki, Kiyonori (2015): “SAT大蔵経テキストデータベース 人文学におけるオープンデータの活用に向けて”, in: Journal of Information Processing and Management 58, 6: 422–437.
  17. Natale, Simone / Surace, Bruno / Mensa, Enrico / Befera, Luca (2025): “ChatGPT for cultural heritage and the customization of generative AI: A talkthrough analysis of the Luigi Einaudi chatbot”, in: New Media & Society: 1–26. DOI: 10.1177/14614448251384258.
  18. Nazar, Rogelio / Acosta, Nicolas (2023): “Termout: A tool for the semi-automatic creation of term databases”, in: Haddad Haddad, Bassam / Rigouts Terryn, Els / Mitkov, Ruslan / Rapp, Reinhard / Zweigenbaum, Pierre / Sharoff, Serge (eds.): Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Terminology in NLP and Translation Studies (ConTeNTS). Varna: INCOMA Ltd 9–18.
  19. Park, Eun-hwa (2013): “The feature of the gwaebul (掛佛) representing the crowned bodhisattva style (戴冠菩薩形) in Chungcheong Province in the 17th century of the Joseon Dynasty” [조선 17세기 충청권역 戴冠菩薩形 掛佛의 특색], in: Munmul Yeongu [문물연구] 23: 91–120.
  20. Park, Jin-ho (2014): "Study on storytelling of digital museum 's exhibition content" [디지털박물관 전시콘텐츠 스토리텔링 연구: 전통문화콘텐츠박물관 전시콘텐츠 분석사례를 중심으로], in: Humanities Contents [인문콘텐츠] 33: 149–183.
  21. Park, So-young (2012): “A study on hanging Buddhist pictures of Maitreya” [朝鮮後半期 彌勒佛掛佛圖 硏究], in: Gangjwa Misulsa [강좌미술사, The Art History Journal] 39: 139–162.
  22. Trichopoulos, George / Konstantakis, Markos / Caridakis, George / Katifori, Akrivi / Koukouli, Maria (2023): “Crafting a Museum Guide Using ChatGPT4”, in: Big Data and Cognitive Computing 7, 3: 1–15.
  23. Wang, Shanshan / Lu, Heng / Yao, Hong / Wu, Zhen / Hu, Chao / Xie, Xiaoyun / Yu, Xiaoyi (2025): “Cultural Heritage Assistant: A Lightweight Retrieval Augmented Generation Method Enhanced Vision-Language Model for Cultural Heritage”, in: Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Intelligent Computing (ICIC 2025): 1–14.
  24. Yoo, Dong-hwan (2014): “A Study of Digital Museum based Digital Heritage”, in: The Korea Contents Society ICCC (2014): 67–68.
  25. Yoo, Sang-woo / Kim, Se-ah (2023): “Reconceptualizing museum docents based on historical considerations”, in: Journal of Museum Studies 45: 141–175.
  26. Standards & Ontologies
  27. International Organization for Standardization (2023): Information and documentation — A reference ontology for the interchange of cultural heritage information (ISO 21127:2023; CIDOC CRM v7.1.3). https://www.iso.org/standard/85100.html [05.05.2026].
  28. Miles, Alistair / Bechhofer, Sean (eds.) (2009): SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System reference (W3C Recommendation, 18 August 2009). World Wide Web Consortium. https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/ [05.05.2026].
  29. DCMI Usage Board (2020): DCMI Metadata Terms (Recommendation, 20 January 2020). Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/ [05.05.2026].
  30. Brickley, Dan / Miller, Libby (2014): FOAF vocabulary specification 0.99 (Paddington edition, 14 January 2014). http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/ [05.05.2026].
  31. Lebo, Timothy / Sahoo, Satya / McGuinness, Deborah (eds.) (2013): PROV-O: The PROV ontology (W3C Recommendation, 30 April 2013). World Wide Web Consortium. https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/ [05.05.2026].
  32. D'Arcus, Bruce / Giasson, Frédérick (2009): Bibliographic Ontology Specification (Revision 1.3, 4 November 2009). http://bibliotek-o.org/bibo/ [05.05.2026].
  33. Web Resources
  34. Academy of Korean Studies (n.d.): Encyclopedia of Korean Culture [한국민족문화대백과사전]. http://encykorea.aks.ac.kr/ [05.05.2026].
  35. Academy of Korean Studies, Digital Humanities Lab (n.d.): CHAID ontology [Custom domain ontology]. http://www.dh.aks.ac.kr/ontologies/CHAID# [05.05.2026].
  36. Digital Dictionary of Buddhism (n.d.): Digital Dictionary of Buddhism (DDB). http://www.buddhism-dict.net/ddb/ [05.05.2026].
  37. Google (n.d.): Google Arts & Culture. https://artsandculture.google.com/ [05.05.2026].
  38. Korea Heritage Service (n.d.): Korean Heritage Portal [국가유산포털]. https://www.heritage.go.kr/ [05.05.2026].
  39. Software
  40. Chase, Harrison (2022): LangChain (Version 1.2.15) [Software]. https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain [05.05.2026].
  41. Google (2024): Google Generative AI Python SDK (Version 0.8.5) [Software]. https://github.com/google/generative-ai-python [05.05.2026].
  42. Google (2025): Gemini 2.5 Flash [Large language model]. https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemini/ [05.05.2026].
  43. Neo4j, Inc. (2024): Neo4j (Version 5.26.0 LTS) [Computer software]. https://neo4j.com/ [05.05.2026].