DH 2026

Daejeon, July 27–31

Workshop

Documenting Exhibition’s Display

Zoë Renaudie
Université de Montréal, Canada · zoe.renaudie@umontreal.ca
David Valentine
Université de Montréal, Canada · david.valentine@umontreal.ca
Emmanuel Château-Dutier
Université de Montréal, Canada · emmanuel.chateau.dutier@umontreal.ca

Half-day workshop (3-4 hours), offered in-person with hybrid option for remote participants.

No separate call for participation.

Introducing the Display Tool for Spatial Documentation of Exhibitions

Exhibition space is never neutral. The ways in which artworks and objects are positioned, the distances between them, the architectural features that frame them, and the pathways visitors take through galleries all fundamentally shape how cultural artifacts are experienced, understood, and remembered. Yet despite the centrality of spatial arrangements to curatorial practice, the documentation and analysis of these spatial dimensions remain surprisingly underdeveloped in museum studies and art history. The topological relationships between objects, the sequential organization of rooms, and the subtle juxtapositions that generate meaning remain largely undocumented. Researchers attempting to reconstruct past exhibitions must work with incomplete and often contradictory documentation, formulating educated hypotheses about the display.

This workshop introduces Display, an OWL ontology and a free and open-source web application developed by the Ouvroir d’histoire de l’art et de muséologie numériques at the Université de Montréal, as part of the Partnership New Uses of Collections in Art Museums (CIÉCO) funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Display is both a conceptual and technical device designed to enable structured documentation of exhibition installations by linking artworks, exhibits and spatial configurations to understand curatorial decisions through a flexible ontological model capable of handling the uncertainties inherent in historical documentation.

The development of Display emerged from an iterative co-creation process grounded in concrete research cases. Rather than starting with abstract technical requirements, the project moved from the field to the ontology, and from the ontology to the user interface, remaining anchored in the reality of curatorial and scholarly practices. The Display ontology allows for explicit and formal description of the features of an installation or exhibition (proximity and contiguity of works, vis-à-vis arrangements, etc.). While remaining compatible with CIDOC’s Conceptual Reference Model (CIDOC-CRM), the ontology prioritizes modelling centred on spatial relationships by drawing on a specialization of the Building Topology Ontology (BOT). This abstract model allows for the recording of historical information concerning installations and proposes solutions to account for uncertainty and documentary gaps.

The application architecture is based on implementing a SPARQL endpoint using the Apache Jena framework, coupled with an inference engine. The use of CRAFTS enabled the creation of a REST API for data access through JSON-LD using patterns close to those proposed by the Linked Art model. The web client articulates three distinct views for data entry and visualization: a 3D scene developed with Three.js, a documentary source processing module, and a structured data view. Within a project, users can create different versions of an exhibition by exploiting archival or visual documentation. The interface design is based on the procedures employed by researchers in documenting exhibitions and allows for exploring different hypotheses while relying on the data model.

Figure 1. View of the 3D scene of the Display tool, developed by Tractr. Artwork information is provided for illustrative purposes only.

This workshop offers both a practical experience and a space for critical reflection on the epistemological dimensions of exhibition documentation. Participants will learn how the ontology describes the topology of the exhibition, how to import exhibition data from various sources, model relationships between objects using the Display interface, manage sources, and visualize installations. It will be the perfect opportunity for us to conduct a user study to get feedback for further iteration. Beyond the digital tool, we will present Display as a research environment in which technical development, ontological modelling, and exhibition research are iteratively co-produced, allowing methodological questions to directly shape the tool and, in turn, the research it enables.

Workshop Leader Contact Information

Zoë Renaudie
Email: zoe.renaudie@umontreal.ca
Affiliation: Université de MontréalAffiliation: Université de Montréal

Zoë Renaudie is a contemporary art conservator and head of the laboratory of digital history of art and museology called L’Ouvroir at the Université de Montréal. With over a decade of experience in cultural institutions, she has specialized in exhibition documentation and the conservation of complex artworks. This practical expertise inspired her return to research, conducting a PhD under the supervision of Emmanuel Château-Dutier at the Université de Montréal, entitled Conserving the Ephemeral: Toward the Documentation of the Exhibition, as part of the partnership New Uses of Collections in Art Museums (CIÉCO). She gives courses and professional training on digital approaches to art history and museology.

Target Audience and Expected Number of Participants

Target audience: The workshop is designed for any digital humanities researchers interested in application with semantic web back-end, or museum professionals (curators, registrars, conservators), art historians, and graduate students working with exhibition documentation, spatial analysis of cultural heritage, or digital museology.

The workshop welcomes participants with different levels of technical expertise, requiring no prior knowledge of ontologies or Semantic Web technologies.

Expected participants: 20 participants, based on attendance at previous Display workshops conducted by L’Ouvroir and growing interest in exhibition documentation tools within the digital humanities community.

Workshop Agenda

Introduction and Context (15 minutes)

  • Challenges of documenting ephemeral exhibitions: temporality, materiality, and curatorial choices
  • Relevance to museum practice, research, and heritage preservation
  • Context of co-creation of the tool

Presentation of Display (15 minutes)

  • Overview of Display’s development, underlying data model, OWL ontology and core functionalities
  • Capabilities for representing object relations, spatial relationships, and uncertainty
  • Integration with archival sources and compatibility with international standards (CIDOC-CRM, BOT, Linked Art)

Hands-on Session (2 hours with a break in the middle)

  • Participants will declare RDF triplets with the ontology in turtle. 
  • Import sample exhibition data, including object metadata, floor plans, and photographs.
  • Exercises will cover modelling layouts, visualizing relational information.
  • Participants will explore Display’s capacity to experiment with different curatorial scenarios and generate interactive 3D representations.

User Experience and Feedback (15 minutes)

  • Gathering feedback on usability and interface design
  • Discussion of challenges encountered during hands-on session
  • Sharing participant experiences and use cases from their own work
  • Critical reflection on epistemological and ethical dimensions of exhibition documentation

Conclusion and Perspectives (15 minutes)

  • Discussion of practical adoption in institutional contexts
  • Opportunities for further development, including interoperability with other digital humanities tools
  • Contributions to scholarly research and museum practice
  • Next steps for community engagement and tool development

Total duration: 3 hours (4 hours with informal setup/buffer time)

Special Requirements for Technical Support

  • Room equipped with projector and screen
  • Stable internet connection for presenter and all participants
  • Participants should bring their own laptops
  • No software pre-installation or special computational resources required
  • Hybrid setup: video conferencing capability for remote participants (camera, microphone, screen sharing)
References
  1. Abadie, Nathalie, et Ghislain Atemezing (2019) « Ontologie des primitives géométriques ». Spécification. Paris : Institut national de l’information géographique et forestière, 12 février. http://data.ign.fr/def/geometrie.
  2. Altshuler, Bruce, éd. (2013) Biennials and beyond: Exhibitions That Made Art History, 1962–2002. Vol. 2. Exhibitions That Made Art History. London : Phaidon Press.
  3. Biella, Daniel, et Wolfram Luther (2009) « A Parameterizable Framework for Replicated Experiments in Virtual 3D Environments ». Dans Web Information Systems and Technologies, édité par José Cordeiro, Slimane Hammoudi, et Joaquim Filipe, 18:361–74. Berlin : Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01344-7_27.
  4. Biella, Daniel, Wolfram Luther, et Nelson Baloian (2010a) « Beyond the ARCO Standard ». Dans 2010 16th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia, 184–91. Seoul : IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VSMM.2010.5665985.
  5. ——— (2010b) « Virtual Museum Exhibition Designer Using Enhanced ARCO Standard ». Dans 2010 XXIX International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society, 226–35. Antofagasta : IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCCC.2010.11.
  6. Bruseker, George, Nicola Carboni, et Anaïs Guillem (2015) « Semantically Documenting Virtual Reconstruction: Building a Path to Knowledge Provenance ». ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences II-5-W3 (11 août) : 33–40. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-W3-33-2015.
  7. Bruseker, George, Nicola Carboni, et Anaïs Guillem (2017) « Cultural Heritage Data Management: The Role of Formal Ontology and CIDOC CRM ». Dans Heritage and Archaeology in the Digital Age: Acquisition, Curation, and Dissemination of Spatial Cultural Heritage Data, édité par Matthew L. Vincent, Víctor Manuel López-Menchero Bendicho, Marinos Ioannides, et Thomas E. Levy, 93–131. Cham : Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65370-9_6.
  8. Carboni, Nicola, Thibault Usel, et Béatrice Joyeux-Prunel (2023) « Intégrer des données historiques spatio-temporelles ». https://hal.science/hal-04110759.
  9. Costin, Aaron, et Pieter Pauwels (2022) « Building Information Modeling and Ontologies: Overview of Shared Representations ». Dans Research Companion to Building Information Modeling, 12–34. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/display/edcoll/9781839105517/9781839105517.00010.xml.
  10. Davallon, Jean (1999) L’exposition à l’œuvre: stratégies de communication et médiation symbolique. Communication et civilisation. Paris : L’Harmattan.
  11. ——— (2011) « Le pouvoir sémiotique de l’espace ». Hermes, La Revue 61, no 3 : 38–44.
  12. Doerr, Martin, Achille Felicetti, Sorin Hermon, Gerald Hiebel, Athina Kritsotaki, Anja Masur, Paola Ronzino, et al (2020) « Definition of the CRMarchaeo: An Extension of CIDOC CRM to Support the Archaeological Excavation Process ». Février. https://cidoc-crm.org/crmarchaeo/fm_releases.
  13. Garcia, Maria del Mar Roldán, Martin Jerónimo Salvachúa, María Luisa Díez Platas, et Nuria Rodriguez Ortega (2023) « OntoExhibit ». Consulté le 8 décembre. https://complexhibit-project.github.io/OntoExhibit/index-en.html.
  14. Greenberg, Reesa (2009) « ’Remembering Exhibitions’: From Point to Line to Web ». Tate Papers, no 12. https://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/tate-papers/12/remembering-exhibitions-from-point-to-line-to-web.
  15. Guillem, Anaïs, Antoine Gros, Kevin Reby, Violette Abergel, et Livio DeLuca (2023) « RCC8 for CIDOC CRM: Semantic Modeling of Mereological and Topological Spatial Relations in Notre-Dame de Paris ». Dans SWODCH 2023, édité par Antonis Bikakis, Roberta Ferrario, Stéphane Jean, Béatrice Markhoff, Alessandro Mosca, et Marianna Nicolosi Asmundo. Athènes, 7 novembre. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3540/paper2.pdf.
  16. Merminod, Vanessa (2012) « L’exposition : un nouvel objet de patrimoine ? Regards sur l’exposition Mémoires du Musée de la civilisation de Québec ». Material Culture Review 76 : 60–72.
  17. Rasmussen, Mads Holten, Maxime Lefrançois, Georg Ferdinand Schneider, et Pieter Pauwels (2020) « BOT: The Building Topology Ontology of the W3C Linked Building Data Group ». Édité par Krzysztof Janowicz. Semantic Web 12, no 1 (19 novembre) : 143–61. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-200385.
  18. ——— (2021) « Building Topology Ontology ». Draft Community Group Report. W3C, 28 juin. https://w3c-lbd-cg.github.io/bot/.
  19. Sacher, Daniel, Benjamin Weyers, Daniel Biella, et Wolfram Luther (2014a) « Smart Museums – Exploiting Generative Virtual Museums ». Dans Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence. Personalisation and User Adapted Services, édité par Ramón Hervás, Sungyoung Lee, Chris Nugent, et José Bravo, 384–87. Cham : Springer International Publishing.
  20. ——— (2014b) « Towards an Evaluation of a Metadata Standard for Generative Virtual Museums ». Dans Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence. Personalisation and User Adapted Services, édité par Ramón Hervás, Sungyoung Lee, Chris Nugent, et José Bravo, 357–64. Cham : Springer International Publishing.
  21. ——— (2017) Generative Approach to Virtual Museums Using a New Metadata Format: A Curators’, Visitors’ and Software Engineers’ Perspective. S.l. : Logos Verlag Berlin.
  22. Staniszewski, Mary Anne. 1998. The Power of Display: A History of Exhibition Installations at the Museum of Modern Art. Cambridge : MIT Press.