DH 2026

Daejeon, July 27–31

Fri, July 3114:00–15:30S097108
Long Paper

»In Berlin no grass grows. In Vienna it withers.« A quantitative spatial-semantic comparison between Berlin and Vienna in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries

Daniel Kababgi
Bielefeld University, Germany · daniel.kababgi@uni-bielefeld.de
Emilie Sitter
Bielefeld University, Germany · emilie.sitter@uni-bielefeld.de
Berenike Herrmann
Bielefeld University, Germany · berenike.herrmann@uni-bielefeld.de

IntroductionThe title is a translation of Karl Kraus: In Berlin wächst kein Gras. In Wien verdorrt es. Kraus, Sprüche und Widersprüche, 4. Auflage 1924 (EA: 1909). VII. Länder und Leute. Furthermore, the data and code used in this paper can be found here: https://github.com/DanielKababgi/dh2026-concreteness-in-lit

The city as a literary topos “is certainly not an invention of modernity” (Braungart 2008, 16, transl. ours), but in the 19th century, full-blown industrialisation and urbanisation (Fisher 1988, 107) made the modern metropolis and the experience of urban spaces a rather dominant theme. In the German-language context, literary imaginations of the city, addressing dimensions of space, sociality, and affect, concentrate especially on ‘Vienna’ and ‘Berlin’.

A Computational Literary Studies perspective on urban space can build on several studies that address the relationship between emotions and aspects of space, especially concreteness. Kröncke et al. (2022, 2023, 2024) examine text-encoded emotions and concreteness in poetry from Realism to Modernism, Grisot and Herrmann (2023, 2025) examine emotional encoding of types of space in German-language fiction around 1900, while a host of studies observes a historical increase in linguistic concreteness in English-language prose (Heuser 2019; Snefjella, Généreux, and Kuperman 2019; Sun and Wang 2022).

This article examines text-encoded emotions and concreteness in spatial descriptions of ‘Vienna’ and ‘Berlin’ in German-language narrative prose fiction. Asking about diachronic change, it situates both big cities within their distinct developments of literary modernism around 1900. Building on prior literary-historical work, our initial hypothesis is that within the time frame, spatial descriptions of the big city become overall more concrete. We also assume that positive emotions encoded in the texts decrease.Arno Holz, a proponent of naturalism, pleaded for a more concrete and creative description of reality in literature (cf. Kanz 2019, 348). In addition, we ask about two specific ‘modernisms’ that emerged around 1900, whereby we link the degree of concreteness and emotional encoding to spatial descriptions of the two respective cities. Finally, we introduce the “Big City Prose Corpus” (GroProKo) that includes literary prose texts that depict or mention either Berlin or Vienna. Emotions and lexical concreteness are identified using automatic annotation.

State of research and theory

Sentiment and concreteness

Literary texts vary in their degree of concreteness and also their emotional profiles diachronically and synchronically, which poses interesting questions about the representation of space in terms of diegesis as well as style. Sentiment analysis, the computational analysis of text-encoded emotions, has become a standard instrument in CLS (Haider et al. 2020; Dennerlein, Schmidt and Wolff 2023; Grisot and Herrmann 2023; Herrmann and Lüdtke 2023; Kröncke et al. 2024). Snefjella, Généreux and Kuperman (2019) and Sun and Wang (2022) show a diachronic increase in the concreteness of English from the nineteenth to the twentieth century. Herrmann (2018) examines the relationship between metaphor, word classes, and vividness, showing that a type of concreteness is present in vivid metaphors involving content words, but also in texts with low metaphor density that appear to belong to a different genre.

In terms of method, lexicon-based detection of sentiment, as well as concreteness, has to deal with word-level ambiguity because the dictionaries are not context-sensitive (Löhr 2022). However, both sentiment and concreteness analysis have been evaluated to produce good-enough results. For sentiment lexicons, coverage is a typical measure to evaluate validity (cf. Grisot and Herrmann 2023). The validity of concreteness lexicons has been evaluated by correlating human concreteness ratings with embedding-based scores (Bizzoni, Feldkamp, and Nielbo 2025).

Berlin and Vienna

Urban fiction writing around 1900 explores the social, political, and cognitive effects of industrialisation and urbanisation, where cities function as spaces of action and imagination (Williams 1973; Schutte and Sprengel 1987; Fisher 1988; Berbig et al. 2011; Berbig and Göttsche 2013). In German-language literature, Berlin and Vienna in particular are each associated with their own cultural and poetic ‘modernism’ (Wunberg 1993).

Between 1871 and 1912, Berlin experienced massive growth (Reulecke 1985; Berbig et al. 2011, 2), marked by the increasingly pressing ‘social question’ (Bodenschatz 2011). As an ‘industrial hub’, Berlin did not appear very aesthetically pleasing (Schutte and Sprengel 1987; Berbig et al. 2011). By the late nineteenth century, poorer milieus became a key thematic focus of especially naturalist texts, characterised by a high degree of detail and concreteness. The ‘Berliner Moderne’ demanded a departure from Poetic Realism and its idealised representation of reality (Kanz 2019).

From roughly 1850 to 1918, Vienna was shaped by the economic and social tensions of the disintegrating Habsburg monarchy (Huyssen 1998; Irsigler and Orth 2015). Urbanisation and industrialisation fueled population growth and social tensions (Oei 2013; Lorenz 2007). Around 1900, Vienna’s heterogeneous cultural and literary landscape (Lorenz 2007, 4; Irsigler and Orth 2015, 9) became associated with melancholic topoi (e.g., Oei 2013; Wolf 2015), incarnated by the fin de siècle and the “décadence”, an atmosphere of decline (Irsigler and Orth 2015, 12). These literary “moods” are specifically rendered in descriptions of space (Niefanger 2011, 52).

As this Viennese literature programmatically distances itself from Naturalism and Realism (Lorenz 2007, 31; Irsigler and Orth 2015, 27) with a more symbolic poetics, we assume that spatial descriptions in Viennese literature around the turn of the century are more abstract and more negative than those in Berlin literature.

Corpus

We introduce GroProKo, which consists of fictional German-language prose texts published between 1775 and 1935 (Figure 1) and bears reference to Vienna and/or Berlin. It comprises N=252 full literary texts  (N=26.11 million tokens) by a total of N=109 authors (n=89 male, n=20 female).

Figure Figure 1: Distribution of publication years.

For the corpus, we selected prose texts classified as urban writing in literary research, as well as texts with particularly frequent mentions of “Berlin” or “Vienna” from a larger corpus with N=2,635 texts (cf. Kababgi and Herrmann 2023). Historical spellings were normalised using CAB (Jurish 2012). Of the N=252 texts, n=131 deal with Berlin and n=121 with Vienna.

Method

Spatial descriptions

Spatial descriptions were automatically extracted from the corpus using Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct (Yang et al. 2024) as described and recommended by Sitter et al. (2025). All sentences describe static spatial conditions without any immediate actions.

Quantifying sentiment and concreteness

Sentence-level concreteness scores were calculated for the spatial descriptions using the concreteness lexicon of Köper and Schulte im Walde (2016). We computed the mean concreteness score of all lemmatised words per sentence (excluding stop-words) to account for varying sentence length and stop-word usage. Text-encoded emotions and valence were calculated using SentiArt (Jacobs 2019), which was specifically developed for literary texts (Jacobs 2017; Jacobs and Kinder 2019; Jacobs et al. 2020). The sum of SentiArt values per sentence auto-normalises since SentiArt scores can be both positive and negative. The length of the sentence does not matter, since a large number of words indicating a certain trend show up this way. A low value for either valence or any emotion signifies low textual expression or absence of the given variable, while a high value describes strong textual expression of the text-encoded emotion or valence.

For the statistical analysis, we fitted a generalized regression model (Friedman et al. 2010) using R (R Core Team 2025). The model included city and the publication year as fixed factors with an interaction between these predictors.Statistical analysis used R-4.5.2 with the glm function of the stats-modul (v.4.5.2) with the following specification “x ~ pubyear * city”. The interaction term was investigated using Type III ANOVA in the ‘car’ package (Fox and Weisberg 2019).

Results

From the N=252 texts, we extracted N=7,985 spatial descriptions, of which n=5,112 sentences originate from Berlin texts and n=2,873 sentences from Vienna texts (see Figure 2).

Figure Figure 2: Distribution of texts per city.

For the dependent variables concreteness, valence, joy, anger, disgust, and surprise, we observe significant diachronic differences. For sadness and fear, no significant diachronic differences can be observed. For the variables concreteness, valence, disgust, and fear, there are significant differences between the cities and a significant interaction between publication year and city (Table 1).

Table 1: Results of the statistical analysis. CI = confidence interval. The column “Variable” lists the variable and the associated factors that differ statistically. “City” indicates statistical differences between Vienna and Berlin, “pubyear” shows diachronic differences, and “city × pubyear” shows differences in diachronic change between the cities. Significant differences are highlighted: p-values below α=0.01 **, p-values below α=0.05 *.

Variable

Mean

Berlin

Mean ViennaCI 95%p
Concreteness …5.165.10
… city0.26 – 3.660.024 *
… pubyear0.00 – 0.00<0.001 **
… city × pubyear-0.00 – -0.000.020 *
Valence …4.655.49
… city22.45 – 52.30<0.001 **
… pubyear-0.01 – -0.000.024 *
… city × pubyear-0.03 – -0.01<0.001 **
Sadness …2.372.47
… city-14.07 – 15.850.907
… pubyear-0.00 – 0.000.914
… city × pubyear-0.01 – 0.010.918
Joy3.443.7
… city-17.57 – 13.420.793
… pubyear-0.01 – -0.000.034 *
… city × pubyear-0.01 – 0.010.764
Anger …2.592.84
… city-6.47 – 4.410.710
… pubyear-0.01 – -0.00<0.001 **
… city × pubyear0.00 – 0.000.651
Disgust …-0.54-0.72
… city-6.47 – 4.410.005 **
… pubyear-0.01 – -0.000.352
… city × pubyear-0.00 – 0.000.005 **
Surprise …0.610.53
… city-6.47 – 4.410.112
… pubyear-0.01 – -0.000.014 *
… city × pubyear-0.00 – 0.000.109
Fear …1.711.70
… city-35.11 – -8.720.001 **
… pubyear-0.00 – 0.000.749
… city × pubyear0.00 – 0.020.001 **

The regression lines for both cities decrease in parallel for joy and anger, while sadness remains constant across the investigated timeframe. The regression lines for concreteness, valence, disgust, and fear intersect from around 1850 onwards and differ significantly. Overall, values for concreteness and disgust increase, but valence decreases. Fear increases for Vienna and decreases for Berlin (Figure 3). Diachronic change in valence, disgust, and fear is more pronounced in the Vienna subset. The Berlin subset shows a stronger increase only for concreteness, with an intersection already before 1850. The lines for valence and disgust are the only ones to intersect again after 1900.

Figure Figure 3: Regression lines for the variables showing a significant interaction between publication year and city: concreteness (A), valence (B), disgust (C), and fear (D).

Discussion

In line with our first hypothesis, for spatial descriptions, we observe a general shift in concreteness (increase) and negative emotions (increase), but with slightly different patterns for the two cities: The increase in negative emotions is more drastic for Vienna (see fig. 2 B, p=<0.001).  The increase in spatial concreteness is stronger for Berlin (see fig. 2 A, p=0.020). In line with our second prediction, Viennese descriptions are overall less concrete than their Berlin counterparts. By contrast to our third expectation (melancholy), we do not observe any significant change in sadness (p=0.918). However, the decrease in valence (p=<0.001) and increase in fear (p=0.001) in both cities implies that melancholy does not manifest solely as sadness.

For disgust (p=0.005) and fear (p=0.001), there is a significant interaction between publication year and city, with Vienna’s gradient being steeper. This increase in disgust and fear may be cautiously associated with the declining Habsburg monarchy as a literary theme.

Valence decreases for both cities, again with a more pronounced decline for Vienna (p=<0.001). The results overall suggest that texts depicting Vienna show a stronger decline in positive emotions between 1775 and 1935. A finding that may be associated with décadence and a rejection of Naturalism.

Further studies on emotions and concreteness are needed to model genre and the distinction between literary prestige (Herrmann 2018; Kröncke et al. 2023), as well as literariness and fictionality as predictors. Follow-up studies could also take into account the texts' canonicity and underlying poetics, as well as aspects of ‘nationality’ as a historical factor within the German-speaking countries. Analysis procedures optimised for semantic ambiguity should be used. Alongside GroProKo, we are currently developing a corpus of ‘anti-modern’ texts from the same period that explicitly oppose the big cities (cf. Rossbacher 1975). A complementary study devoted to spatial descriptions of the village is in preparation.

References
  1. Berbig, Roland, Iwan-Michelangelo D’Aprile, Helmut Peitsch, and Erhard H. Schütz, Editor. 2011. Berlins 19. Jahrhundert: ein Metropolen-Kompendium. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 
  2. Berbig, Roland, and Dirk Göttsche, Hrsg. 2013. Metropole, Provinz und Welt: Raum und Mobilität in der Literatur des Realismus. De Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110309652. 
  3. Bizzoni, Yuri, Pascale Feldkamp, and Kristoffer L. Nielbo. 2025. Encoding Imagism? Measuring Literary Imageability, Visuality and Concreteness via Multimodal Word Embeddings. https://doi.org/10.26083/TUPRINTS-00030154.
  4. Bodenschatz. 2011. “Auf dem Weg zur Mietkasernenstadt?“ In Berlins 19. Jahrhundert: ein Metropolen-Kompendium, edited by Roland Berbig, Iwan-Michelangelo D’Aprile, Helmut Peitsch, und Erhard H. Schütz, 3–07. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 
  5. Bolognesi, Marianna, and Gerard J. Steen, Editor. 2019. Perspectives on Abstract Concepts: Cognition, Language and Communication. Bd. 65. Human Cognitive Processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:10.1075/hcp.65. 
  6. Braungart, Wolfgang. 2008. “Die Stadtmaus, die Feldmaus und die Freuden der Kunst“. In Provinz und Metropole: zum Verhältnis von Regionalismus und Urbanität in der Literatur, edited by Dieter Burdorf and Stefan Matuschek, 15–34. Beiträge zur neueren Literaturgeschichte, Band 254. Heidelberg: Winter. 
  7. Dennerlein, Katrin, Thomas Schmidt, and Christian Wolff. 2023. “Computational Emotion Classification for Genre Corpora of German Tragedies and Comedies from 17th to Early 19th Century“. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 38 (4): 1466–81. doi:10.1093/llc/fqad046. 
  8. Fisher, Philip. 1988. “City Matters : City Minds. Die Poetik der Großstadt in der modernen Literatur.” In Die Unwirklichkeit der Städte: Grossstadtdarst. zwischen Moderne u. Postmoderne, edited by Klaus R. Scherpe. Rowohlts Enzyklopädie ; 471. Rowohlt-Taschenbuch-Verl.
  9. Friedman, Jerome, Trevor Hastie, and Robert Tibshirani. 2010. ‘Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent’. In Journal of Statistical Software, vol. 33. no. 1. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v33/i01/.
  10. Fox, John, and Sanford Weisberg. 2019. An R Companion to Applied Regression. Third. Sage. https://www.john-fox.ca/Companion/.
  11. Grisot, Giulia, and Berenike Herrmann. 2023. “Examining the Representation of Landscape and Its Emotional Value in German-Swiss Fiction between 1840 and 1940“. Journal of Cultural Analytics 8 (1). doi:10.22148/001c.84475. 
  12. Grisot, G., and Herrmann, B. (2025). “Is Heidi really happier in the mountains? A mixed-methods investigation of spatial affect in fiction”. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics,https://doi.org/10.1177/09639470251337794
  13. Haider, Thomas, Steffen Eger, Evgeny Kim, Roman Klinger, and Winfried Menninghaus. 2020. “PO-EMO: Conceptualization, Annotation, and Modeling of Aesthetic Emotions in German and English Poetry“. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, edited by Nicoletta Calzolari, Frédéric Béchet, Philippe Blache, Khalid Choukri, Christopher Cieri, Thierry Declerck, Sara Goggi, et al. 1652–63. Marseille, France: European Language Resources Association. https://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.205/. 
  14. Herrmann, Berenike. 2018. “Anschaulichkeit messen. Eine quantitative Metaphernanalyse an deutschsprachigen Erzählanfängen zwischen 1880 und 1926“. In Show, don’t tell: Konzepte und Strategien anschaulichen Erzählens, edited by Tilmann A. Köppe und Rüdiger Singer. Bielefeld: Aisthesis Verlag. 
  15. Herrmann, Berenike, and Jana Lüdtke. 2023. “A Fairy Tale Gold Standard. Annotation and Analysis of Emotions in the Children’s and Household Tales by the Brothers Grimm“. HTML ,XML ,PDF. Zeitschrift für digitale Geisteswissenschaften – ZfdG. doi:10.17175/2023_005. 
  16. Heuser, Ryan. 2019. “Abstraction: A literary History“. Stanford: Stanford University. 
  17. Huyssen, Andreas. 1998. “The Disturbance of Vision in Vienna Modernism“. Modernism/Modernity 5 (3). Project MUSE: 33–47. doi:10.1353/mod.1998.0059. 
  18. Irsigler, Ingo, and Dominik Orth. 2015. Einführung in die Literatur der Wiener Moderne. Einführungen Germanistik. Darmstadt: WBG. 
  19. Jacobs, Arthur M. 2017. “Quantifying the Beauty of Words: A Neurocognitive Poetics Perspective“. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11 (Dezember). Frontiers Media SA. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00622. 
  20. ———. 2019. “Sentiment Analysis for Words and Fiction Characters From the Perspective of Computational (Neuro-)Poetics“. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 6 (Juli). Frontiers Media SA. doi:10.3389/frobt.2019.00053. 
  21. Jacobs, Arthur M., Berenike Herrmann, Gerhard Lauer, Jana Lüdtke, and Sascha Schroeder. 2020. “Sentiment Analysis of Children and Youth Literature: Is There a Pollyanna Effect?“ Frontiers in Psychology 11 (September). Frontiers Media SA. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574746. 
  22. Jacobs, Arthur M., and Annette Kinder. 2019. “Computing the Affective-Aesthetic Potential of Literary Texts“. AI 1 (1): 11–27. doi:10.3390/ai1010002. 
  23. Jurish, Bryan. 2012. “Finite-state Canonicalization Techniques for Historical German“. Universität Potsdam. https://www.deutschestextarchiv.de/public/cab/. 
  24. Kababgi, Daniel, and Berenike Herrmann. 2023. ‘A Quantitative Analysis of the Semantics of Fictional Spatial Entities in the German Literature of the 19th Century using SUNSET’. Poster presented at Text+ Plenary 2023.
  25. Kanz, Christine. 2019. “Die literarische Moderne (1890-1920)“. In Deutsche Literaturgeschichte, 9. Auflage, 345–90. Heidelberg: J.B. Metzler. 
  26. Köper, Maximilian, and Sabine Schulte im Walde. 2016. “Automatically Generated Affective Norms of Abstractness, Arousal, Imageability and Valence for 350 000 German Lemmas“. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’16), edited by Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Sara Goggi, Marko Grobelnik, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, et al., 2595–98. Portorož, Slovenia: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). https://aclanthology.org/L16-1413/. 
  27. Kröncke, Merten, Leonard Konle, Fotis Jannidis, and Simone Winko. 2022. “Genitivmetaphern in der Lyrik des Realismus und der frühen Moderne“. Presented at DHd 2022 Kulturen des digitalen Gedächtnisses. 8. Tagung des Verbands „Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum“ (DHd 2022), März 7. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6328069. 
  28. ———. 2023. “Gattungen und Emotionen in der Lyrik des Realismus und der frühen Moderne“. Presented at DHd2023, Trier, März 16. 
  29. Kröncke, Merten, Leonard Konle, Simone Winko, and Fotis Jannidis. 2024. “Modellierung von Gattungsunterschieden. Emotionen in Lyrik, Prosa und Drama“, Februar. Zenodo. doi:10.5281/ZENODO.10698335. 
  30. Löhr, Guido. 2022. “What Are Abstract Concepts? On Lexical Ambiguity and Concreteness Ratings“. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 13 (3): 549–66. doi:10.1007/s13164-021-00542-9. 
  31. Lorenz, Dagmar. 1995. Wiener Moderne. Sammlung Metzler, Bd. 290. Stuttgart: Metzler. 
  32. Niefanger, Dirk. 1993. Produktiver Historismus: Raum und Landschaft in der Wiener Moderne. Studien zur deutschen Literatur 128. Tübingen: M. Niemeyer. 
  33. Oei, Bernd. 2013. Eros & Thanatos. Philosophie und Wiener Melancholie in Arthur Schnitzlers Werk. Reihe Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft. Herbolzheim: Centaurus Verlag & Media. doi:10.1007/978-3-86226-934-1. 
  34. R Core Team. 2025. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
  35. Reulecke, Jürgen. 1985. Geschichte der Urbanisierung in Deutschland. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. 
  36. Rossbacher, Karlheinz. 1975. Heimatkunstbewegung und Heimatroman: zu einer Literatursoziologie der Jahrhundertwende. Literaturwissenschaft, Gesellschaftswissenschaft 13. Stuttgart: E. Klett. 
  37. Schutte, Jürgen, and Peter Sprengel, Hrsg. 1987. Die Berliner Moderne, 1885-1914. Universal-Bibliothek, Nr. 8359. Stuttgart: P. Reclam. 
  38. Sitter, Emilie, Omar Momen, Florian Steig, J. Berenike Herrmann, and Sina Zarrieß. 2025. “Annotating Spatial Descriptions in Literary and Non-Literary Text“. In Proceedings of The 19th Linguistic Annotation Workshop (LAW-XIX). Vienna. 
  39. Snefjella, Bryor, Michel Généreux, and Victor Kuperman. 2019. “Historical Evolution of Concrete and Abstract Language Revisited“. Behavior Research Methods 51 (4): 1693–1705. doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1071-2. 
  40. Solovyev, Valery. 2021. “Concreteness/Abstractness Concept: State of the Art“. In Advances in Cognitive Research, Artificial Intelligence and Neuroinformatics, edited by Boris M. Velichkovsky, Pavel M. Balaban, und Vadim L. Ushakov, 275–83. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71637-0_33. 
  41. Sun, Kun, and Rong Wang. 2022. “The Evolutionary Pattern of Language in English Fiction Over the Last Two Centuries: Insights From Linguistic Concreteness and Imageability“. Sage Open 12 (1): 21582440211069386. doi:10.1177/21582440211069386. 
  42. Wende, Waltraud. 2007. “Großstadtdichtung“. In Metzler Lexikon Literatur: Begriffe und Definitionen, edited by Dieter Burdorf, Christoph Fasbender, und Burkhard Moennighoff, 296. J.B. Metzlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung und Carl Ernst Poeschel GmbH. 
  43. Williams, Raymond. 1973. The Country and the City. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
  44. Wolf, Yvonne. 2015. “Melancholie Und Menschwerdung Zur Zeitenwende: Heimito von Doderers “Ritter-Roman” Das Letzte Abenteuer“. Journal of Austrian Studies 48 (2). Project MUSE: 25–50. doi:10.1353/oas.2015.0026. 
  45. Wunberg, Gotthart. 1993. “Wien und Berlin: Zum Thema Tradition und Moderne“. Cahiers d’études germaniques 24 (1): 219–29. doi:10.3406/cetge.1993.1239. 
  46. Yang, An, Baosong Yang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Zhou, Chengpeng Li, et al. 2024. “Qwen2 Technical Report“. arXiv. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2407.10671.